Wednesday, March 10, 2021

The Morning: The new Hong Kong

A Times correspondent explains what happened.

Good morning. Our colleague Vivian Wang helps you make sense of China’s crackdown on Hong Kong.

Protesters clashed with the police in Hong Kong in 2019.Lam Yik Fei for The New York Times

‘It has absolutely worked’

China’s crackdown on Hong Kong has happened swiftly: A rising power has asserted its authority over a global financial capital, through a harsh national security law enacted last summer.

It’s one of the world’s most consequential stories, yet one often overshadowed by the pandemic. This morning, I’m focusing on Hong Kong, with help from my colleague Vivian Wang, who’s based there. Our exchange follows.

David: Britain handed over control of Hong Kong to China almost 25 years ago, and there has long been a pro-democracy movement there. Why did Xi Jinping and the rest of China’s leadership decide to act now?

Vivian: The short answer is the enormous antigovernment protest movement in 2019, in response to a government proposal that would have allowed extraditions to mainland China.

The scale of the protests really shook Beijing. All the previous protest movements had lasted a few months, at most. This time, there was huge support, and it wasn’t dying down on its own.

Officials in Beijing also hated that foreign politicians, like those in the U.S., were so vocal in support of the protesters. Beijing is really worried that Hong Kong could be a base for foreign powers to try to topple the Chinese government.

From Beijing’s perspective, has the crackdown worked? And has it created any problems for the central government?

In many ways, it has absolutely worked. There are no more street protests. There’s extensive self-censorship. Virtually every prominent pro-democracy activist is in exile, in jail, awaiting trial or has disappeared from public life.

But there’s a lot of simmering anger among Hong Kongers, even if they don’t dare express it publicly anymore. They still shop at stores and restaurants they think support the democracy movement. That’s why we see Beijing continuing to apply pressure. It clearly, and I think rightly, doesn’t think the threat is past.

As far as consequences, the crackdown has brought international condemnation, and the U.S. has imposed sanctions on Chinese and Hong Kong officials. The question is how much China cares. At the moment, it seems to think that it is ascendant enough to weather this.

Golden Bauhinia Square, a symbol of Hong Kong’s return from British to Chinese rule.Lam Yik Fei for The New York Times

Is the goal to turn Hong Kong into another Chinese city — one that’s politically indistinguishable from, say, Shanghai — or does the leadership still want Hong Kong to be distinct?

The framework that has always been used to describe Hong Kong post-handover is “one country, two systems.” Many people understood the “two systems” part to be twofold: Not only was Hong Kong capitalist while China was socialist, but Hong Kong also was relatively politically free, while the mainland was not.

Chinese officials still insist that they’re committed to “one country, two systems.” But their focus seems very much to be on keeping Hong Kong as a separate, hypercapitalist system, not on keeping its separate political identity. Many Hong Kongers have long said that they expected their city to become just another mainland metropolis eventually.

I have a hard time seeing how this story ends with anything other than victory for China’s leaders and defeat for the pro-democracy movement. Do people within the movement see any reason for optimism?

Ever since the security law was enacted, the mood within the pro-democracy movement has been bleak. I expected at least some people to offer fiery defiance and remind people that there is still hope — if only just as a rallying cry, whether they believed it or not. But pretty consistently across people I talk to, the consensus is that there’s not much they can do to change the situation, at least for now.

That’s why you see many people making preparations to go abroad. And not just wealthy Hong Kongers with dual citizenships — people with no experience outside Hong Kong or who don’t speak much English are doing so, too.

China’s leaders also consider Taiwan to be part of their country. But Taiwan, unlike Hong Kong, has an independent government. How do you think Hong Kong affects Taiwan?

Many people see Beijing’s actions on Hong Kong as a harbinger of, or a laboratory for, more aggressive actions on Taiwan. It’s all part of an increasingly confident Chinese government that feels it can take these risks.

At the same time, the crackdown is likely driving public opinion in Taiwan further from Beijing. In the past, Beijing has also proposed reunification with Taiwan under a model of “one country, two systems.” Many Taiwan residents can look at Hong Kong and see how that has turned out.

For more: Edward Wong, a Times correspondent who spent nine years reporting on China and has covered Hong Kong protests, recommends two episodes of “This American Life” — “Umbrellas Up” from 2019 and “Umbrellas Down” from 2020.

THE LATEST NEWS

The Virus
Sources: State and county health departments.By Jasmine C. Lee
  • Type 1 diabetes will qualify you for a Covid vaccine in Ohio, but not in Indiana. Patchwork rules have left people with chronic illness struggling to convince officials that they deserve priority.
Politics
  • The House is set to pass the $1.9 trillion pandemic relief bill today, sending it to President Biden for his signature.
  • Biden plans to nominate Lina Khan to the Federal Trade Commission, a sign that he is taking an adversarial approach to Big Tech. (Read a profile of Khan or listen to a podcast with her.)
  • The House passed a labor rights bill to strengthen unions, but it faces an uphill climb in the Senate.
  • Donald Trump put his name on the stimulus checks issued during his administration. Biden won’t.
  • And Trump is urging his supporters to send donations to his new political action committee — not to the institutional groups that traditionally control G.O.P. coffers.
Other Big Stories
A CT scan of the lungs of a healthy adult man.Alamy Stock Photo
Morning Reads
The head and the body of Elysia marginata.Sayaka Mitoh

Trilobites: These sea creatures can chop off their own heads and grow new bodies.

From Opinion: Raising the minimum wage improves mental health, the journalist Jason Cherkis argues.

Lives Lived: In “The Phantom Tollbooth,” a touchstone of children’s literature, a bored boy named Milo passes through a tollbooth in his room to a land of whimsy, wordplay and imagination. The book’s author, Norton Juster, died at 91.

The news anchor Roger Mudd was best known for his interview with Senator Edward Kennedy in 1979, when he asked a simple question: “Why do you want to be president?” Mudd died at 93.

If you’ve found this newsletter helpful, please consider subscribing to The New York Times — with this special offer. Your support makes our work possible.

ARTS AND IDEAS

The music that got us through the pandemic

Phoebe BridgersJohn Desmonds

From virtual concerts to the nightly clanging of pots and pans, music has helped create a sense of community in the pandemic. For its annual music issue, The Times Magazine delved into 19 artists and songs that matter right now.

There are the joyful, maximalist pop of Sophie, who died in January; the melodrama of a Drake track; and the melancholy of Phoebe Bridgers’s music. Other highlights include an essay on “WAP,” Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion’s gleeful ode to sexual liberation, and a profile of La Doña, a would-be pop star whose EP dropped just as the world was shutting down. Go through the list to discover some new music, as well as revisit a few hits.

PLAY, WATCH, EAT

What to Cook
Andrew Scrivani for The New York Times

Minced anchovies and garlic butter deepen this seared salmon’s flavor.

What to Watch

How did “WandaVision” deliver a superhero show while also being a meditation on grief and sitcom history? Its creator explains.

What to Listen to

Need help managing money? There’s a podcast for that. No financial question is too embarrassing or complex.

Late Night
Now Time to Play

The Morning now includes a bonus game from the team that creates Spelling Bee and the Crossword. The current game is Ditloids. The answers to yesterday’s: “3 = B of the U.S.G.” meant branches of the U.S. government, “4 = Q. in a G.” meant quarts in a gallon and “5 = D. in a Z.C.” meant digits in a ZIP code.

Today’s are:

6 = F. on “F.”

7 = W. of the A.W.

8 = A.N. of O.

The pangrams from yesterday’s Spelling Bee were dormant and mordant. Here is today’s puzzle — or you can play online.

Here’s today’s Mini Crossword, and a clue: Pinocchio’s problem (five letters).

If you’re in the mood to play more, find all our games here.

Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — David

P.S. What will your life look like after Covid? The Times wants to hear about your hopes, fears, predictions and more. Share them here.

Today’s episode of “The Daily” is about a police officer’s account of the Capitol riot. On “The Argument,” how much student loan debt should we cancel?

Claire Moses, Ian Prasad Philbrick, Tom Wright-Piersanti and Sanam Yar contributed to The Morning. You can reach the team at themorning@nytimes.com.

Need help? Review our newsletter help page or contact us for assistance.

The Morning Briefing newsletter is now The Morning newsletter. You received this email because you signed up for the newsletter from The New York Times, or as part of your New York Times account.

To stop receiving these emails, unsubscribe or manage your email preferences.

Subscribe to The Times

Connect with us on:

facebooktwitterinstagram

Change Your EmailPrivacy PolicyContact UsCalifornia Notices

The New York Times Company. 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018

No comments:

Post a Comment